Intempéries

Carbon Brief provides an updated analysis of when the world will likely exceed the Paris 1.5C limit

Le secrétaire-général de l’ONU appelle à une action immédiate pour le climat. Selon lui, la décennie actuelle est décisive. Le GIEC a publié leurs calculs détaillés concernant l’année 2023. Cette s…

Annually updated, IPCC AR6 consistent indicators of human-induced global warming, greenhouse gas emissions, and the remaining global carbon budget.

Abstract. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) assessments are the trusted source of scientific evidence for climate negotiations taking place under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). Evidence-based decision-making needs to be informed by up-to-date and timely information on key indicators of the state of the climate system and of the human influence on the global climate system. However, successive IPCC reports are published at intervals of 5–10 years, creating potential for an information gap between report cycles. We follow methods as close as possible to those used in the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report (AR6) Working Group One (WGI) report. We compile monitoring datasets to produce estimates for key climate indicators related to forcing of the climate system: emissions of greenhouse gases and short-lived climate forcers, greenhouse gas concentrations, radiative forcing, the Earth's energy imbalance, surface temperature changes, warming attributed to human activit

Natural ecosystems store large amounts of carbon globally, as organisms absorb carbon from the atmosphere to build large, long-lasting, or slow-decaying structures such as tree bark or root systems. An ecosystem’s carbon sequestration potential is tightly linked to its biological diversity. Yet when considering future projections, many carbon sequestration models fail to account for the role biodiversity plays in carbon storage. Here, we assess the consequences of plant biodiversity loss for carbon storage under multiple climate and land-use change scenarios. We link a macroecological model projecting changes in vascular plant richness under different scenarios with empirical data on relationships between biodiversity and biomass. We find that biodiversity declines from climate and land use change could lead to a global loss of between 7.44-103.14 PgC (global sustainability scenario) and 10.87-145.95 PgC (fossil-fueled development scenario). This indicates a self-reinforcing feedback loop, where higher levels

Global temperature (12-month mean) is still rising at 1.56°C relative to 1880-1920 in the GISS analysis through April (Fig. 1). [Robert Rohde reports that it is 1.65°C relative to 1850-1900 in the BerkeleyEarth analysis.[3]] Global temperature is likely to continue to rise a bit for at least a month, peak this summer, and then decline as the El Nino fades toward La Nina. Acceleration of global warming is now hard to deny. The GISS 12-month temperature is now 0.36°C above the 0.18°C/decade trend line, which is 3.6 times the standard deviation (0.1°C). Confidence in global warming acceleration thus exceeds 99%, but we need to see how far temperature falls with the next La Nina before evaluating the post-2010 global warming rate.

L’effondrement des écosystèmes serait dangereux pour l’économie. Il peut se répercuter au niveau global. La forêt amazonienne, les tourbières tropicales et les mangroves contiennent actuellement environ 220 gigatonnes de carbone. Si elles sont perturbées, elles peuvent subir des changements incontrôlables qui feraient basculer l’écosystème vers une savane non boisée. Leur effondrement provoquerait des émissions de carbone équivalentes à environ 20 ans d’émissions mondiales de CO2 actuelles. Cela pourrait empêcher le maintien d’un climatique de moins d’ 1,5°C, et aurait de nombreuses conséquences directes.

Exclusive: Planet is headed for at least 2.5C of heating with disastrous results for humanity, poll of hundreds of scientists finds

Global Report on Food Crises (GRFC) 2024

L’analyse de 186 études d’évaluation de différentes mesures de conservation de part le monde prouve l’efficacité globale de ces dispositifs. Mais il faut en faire plus pour éradiquer la chute du vivant en cours.

Over the past 50 years, humans have extracted the Earth’s groundwater stocks at a steep rate, largely to fuel global agro-economic development. Given society’s growing reliance on groundwater, we explore ‘peak water limits’ to investigate whether, when and where humanity might reach peak groundwater extraction. Using an integrated global model of the coupled human–Earth system, we simulate groundwater withdrawals across 235 water basins under 900 future scenarios of global change over the twenty-first century. Here we find that global non-renewable groundwater withdrawals exhibit a distinct peak-and-decline signature, comparable to historical observations of other depletable resources (for example, minerals), in nearly all (98%) scenarios, peaking on average at 625 km3 yr−1 around mid-century, followed by a decline through 2100. The peak and decline occur in about one-third (82) of basins, including 21 that may have already peaked, exposing about half (44%) of the global population to groundwater stress. Most

L’hiver passé, des nuages stratosphériques couleur de l’arc-en-ciel ont été observés en Europe. Ils apparaissent habituellement dans les régions les plus froides de la Planète en janvier. En déce…

Global projections of macroeconomic climate-change damages typically consider impacts from average annual and national temperatures over long time horizons1–6. Here we use recent empirical findings from more than 1,600 regions worldwide over the past 40 years to project sub-national damages from temperature and precipitation, including daily variability and extremes7,8. Using an empirical approach that provides a robust lower bound on the persistence of impacts on economic growth, we find that the world economy is committed to an income reduction of 19% within the next 26 years independent of future emission choices (relative to a baseline without climate impacts, likely range of 11–29% accounting for physical climate and empirical uncertainty). These damages already outweigh the mitigation costs required to limit global warming to 2 °C by sixfold over this near-term time frame and thereafter diverge strongly dependent on emission choices. Committed damages arise predominantly through changes in average tempe

Une revue publiée dans PLOS One cumpulse les risques du climat pour les infrastructures. Selon l’étude, les dommages annuels moyens s’élèvent actuellement à environ 700 milliards de dollars par an. Ce chiffre devrait être multiplié par plusieurs au cours du 21e siècle en raison du changement climatique et aussi de l’expansion des actifs d’infrastructure. Le climat aura notamment des conséquences sur le transport routier et ferroviaire : les hautes températures amènent des distorsions des rails, des changements importants de températures provoquent le dégel du permafrost et des déformations du terrain. Les précipitations intenses causent des inondations, des glissements de terrain, des perturbations de l’équipement électronique, des mouvements des rails, et des dépôts sur les voies. Les vents forts déracinent les arbres et transportent d’autres objets, par exemple des tôles ondulées, qui interrompent les lignes électriques et endommagent les rails.

Over the past year, there has been a vigorous debate among scientists – and more broadly – about whether global warming is “accelerating”.

Il y a quelques années, le Programme pour l’Environnement des Nations Unies (PNUE) a soigneusement élaboré un plan pour sauver la Planète. Les émissions de carbone planétaires devaient être réduites de 7,5% ou 8% par année dès 2020. Si ce plan avait été appliqué, elles auraient aujourd’hui baissé d’un tiers. Le PNUE note malheureusement à la fin de 2023 que les émissions de carbone ont atteint un nouveau record, même si celles de l’Europe diminuaient déjà à la fin de 2022. Il est devenu évident que ces objectifs ne seraient pas atteints et que chaque année nous ajoutons à l’atmosphère trop de CO2. D’autres plans de sauvetage de la biosphère ont donc été développés.

A long-term sea level dataset shows ocean surface heights continuing to rise at faster and faster rates over decades of observations. Global average sea level rose by about 0.3 inches (0.76 centimeters) from 2022 to 2023, a relatively large jump due mostly to a warming climate and the development of a strong El Niño. The total rise is equivalent to draining a quarter of Lake Superior into the ocean over the course of a year.

L’évaluation européenne des risques climatiques se penche sur les risques du changement climatique pour l’Homme, la société et l’environnement. Elle cite les chiffres du GIEC et remarque qu’i…

Elizabeth Kolbert on a record-breaking rise in global sea-surface temperatures, which suggests that scientists may not understand how fast the climate is changing.

Evidence shows a continuing increase in the frequency and severity of global heatwaves1,2, raising concerns about the future impacts of climate change and the associated socioeconomic costs3,4. Here we develop a disaster footprint analytical framework by integrating climate, epidemiological and hybrid input–output and computable general equilibrium global trade models to estimate the midcentury socioeconomic impacts of heat stress. We consider health costs related to heat exposure, the value of heat-induced labour productivity loss and indirect losses due to economic disruptions cascading through supply chains. Here we show that the global annual incremental gross domestic product loss increases exponentially from 0.03 ± 0.01 (SSP 245)–0.05 ± 0.03 (SSP 585) percentage points during 2030–2040 to 0.05 ± 0.01–0.15 ± 0.04 percentage points during 2050–2060. By 2060, the expected global economic losses reach a total of 0.6–4.6% with losses attributed to health loss (37–45%), labour productivity loss (18–37%) and i