Nucléaire militaire

Some two dozen climate liability suits have been making their way through the courts since 2015, bolstered by media investigations and attribution studies that are able to accurately pinpoint the precise contribution climate change has made to the damages inflicted by extreme weather events. A 2021 study in the journal Nature, for example, found that just over $8bn (£7bn) of the $62.7bn (£55.3bn) in damages caused by Superstorm Sandy across New York, New Jersey and Connecticut, is attributable to sea-level rise caused by climate change.

Ces campagnes s’inscrivent dans ce que des sociologues et des économistes appellent la « rhétorique du délai » (en anglais, discourses of delay). Alors que les industries pétrolières et gazières avaient une longue histoire de déni des changements climatiques, leur message est à présent plus subtil et, à maints égards, plus efficace qu’un simple rejet de la science du climat.

The framing of climate change, in particular, as something that wouldn’t be an issue if “we” had all just made better consumer choices has been persistent and effective. Every Earth Day, we’re bombarded with tips about how to minimize our personal carbon footprints; meanwhile, it’s 2021 and the GOP is still suggesting tree-planting as climate policy.