Recherche : Articles Audio – podcast
Fiches
Livres
Sites
Vidéos
retour Veille
Uniquement les Articles
Pour voir les références d’un(e) auteur(e), cliquez sur son nom. Pour revenir à la page, utilisez le bouton refresh ci-dessous.
Cela fonctionne également avec les mot-clés de chaque référence.
Résultats pour:
Ugo Bardi
Jumping into the future head first, blindfolded, handcuffed, and in darkness
In a previous post, I defined this graph as “the most amazing graph of the 21st century.” It shows how the US oil production restarted growing in 2010, picking up speed and surpassing the historical record of the “Hubbert Peak,” which took place in 1970. It overcame the dip caused by the Covid pandemic and, two years after my first post on this subject, it keeps growing.
You would think that we have more than sufficient troubles caused by global warming, pollution, resource depletion, biodiversity loss, ecosystem disruption and a few more. But there is a problem that’s not directly related to the natural world, but by a purely human construction: the financial market. Here is a discussion by Ian Schindler — maître de conference émérite (emeritus professor of mathematics) at the University of Toulouse 1, France, who proposes that we are close to a financial collapse.
A post for the anniversary of the execution of Sophie Scholl by the German Nazis in 1943
The Goddess is said to be benevolent and merciful, but she may get angry and become cruel and ruthless. We are used to discussing major events that may destroy civilization, or even the whole humankind. Most are related to global warming: tipping points, “hothouse Earth,” famines, tsunamis, and all the rest. Then, there are other human-made disasters, including the nuclear holocaust and homemade exterminations that can be carried out with simple tools such as machetes. Recently, it became fashionable to cite artificial intelligence as a threat to human beings.
Au 1er siècle de notre ère, le philosophe romain Sénèque (en latin Lucius Annaeus Seneca) observe le début de la désintégration de l’Empire romain. Ce processus ne s’achèvera que quelques siècles plus tard mais il était déjà évident pour ceux qui étaient prêts à regarder au-delà de la surface de l’Empire encore puissant.
The new version of the “Seneca Effect” blog on Substack is doing reasonably well, so I thought it was time to prepare a page that explains what the Seneca Effect is and what it can teach us. (image by Dall-E) During the 1st Century AD, the Roman philosopher Lucius Annaeus Seneca observed the start of the disintegration of the Roman Empire. It was a process that would take a few more centuries to complete, but that was already evident to those who were willing to look beyond the surface of the still powerful Empire.
During the past decades, the idea of acting to counteract the damage done to the ecosystem by humankind's activities has moved along at least two planning stages.
Years ago, James Schlesinger noted that human beings have only two operational modes: complacency and panic. It is an observation that rings true and that we can generalize in terms of groups: some humans are catastrophists, and some are cornucopians. I tend to side with the catastrophists, to the point that I created the term "Seneca Effect" or "Seneca Cliff" to define the rapid decline that comes after that growth stops. Indeed, catastrophes are a common occurrence in human history, but it is also true that sometimes (rarely) a catastrophic decline can be reversed: I termed this effect the "Seneca Rebound."
The book Limits and Beyond, edited by Ugo Bardi and Carlos Alwarez Pereira, provides a 50th anniversary review of the seminal report Limits to Growth (LtG). The following is from the back cover of the book. 50 years ago the Club of Rome commissioned a report: Limits to Growth. They told us that, on our current path, we are heading for collapse in the first half of the 21st century. This book, published in the year 2022, reviews what has happened in the intervening time period. It asks three basic questions:
Ceci est un modeste complément rebondissant sur les réflexions d’Ugo Bardi sur l’effet Sénèque : la descente plus rapide que l’ascension, la destruction plus rapide que la construction. Ce n’est que l’exploration d’hypothèses (toutes pouvant se voir invalidées). La conclusion tentera une sortie positive, bien qu’en évoquant des banalités.
What could bring down the industrial civilization? Would it be global warming (fire) or resource depletion (ice)? At present, it may well be that depletion is hitting us faster. But, in the long run, global warming may hit us much harder. Maybe the fall of our civilization will be Fire AND ice.
One of the most fascinating interpretations of the collapse of civilization is Joseph Tainter’s idea that it is due to “diminishing returns.” It is a well-known concept in economics that Tainter adapts to the historical cycle of civilizations, focusing on the control structures designed to keep together the whole system, the bureaucracy for instance...
Les prix du pétrole restant bas et la production apparemment plus que suffisante pour satisfaire la demande, la plupart des gens ont sauté à la conclusion que toutes les ressources minérales sont abondantes et ne sont pas une préoccupation dans un avenir prévisible.
L’idée de la « falaise de Sénèque » est qu’une certaine entité, d’une entreprise à un empire, a tendance à s’effondrer rapidement lorsqu’elle est sujette à un manque de ressources et, en même temps, affectée par la pollution. Plus d’une fois, j’ai noté qu’il existe de nombreuses formes de pollution ; dans le modèle, le terme désigne tout type de phénomène qui tend à croître aux dépens du capital social d’une société. La bureaucratie satisfait clairement la définition et un excès de celle-ci peut être une cause majeure d’effondrement.
Vous pouvez voir sur l’image l’évolution du concept d’effondrement, de Malthus à Forrester. Ce dernier peut être considéré comme le véritable auteur du concept que j’appelle « falaise de Sénèque » ou « Effet Sénèque ».
Le paradigme de tous les modèles de croissance et de déclin est le modèle de Hubbert. Voici comment il est apparu pour la première fois, dans un article publié par Marion King Hubbert en 1956 où il a montré sa prédiction pour la production de pétrole brut des États-Unis dans les 48 états inférieurs. Non seulement la courbe de production est normalement supposé être symétrique, mais il y a plusieurs cas historiques où elle est biaisé vers l'arrière; quelque chose que nous pourrions appeler l'effet «anti-Sénèque".
Don't you stumble, sometimes, into something that seems to make a lot of sense, but you can't say exactly why? For a long time, I had in mind the idea that when things start going bad, they tend to go bad fast. We might call this tendency the "Seneca effect" or the "Seneca cliff," from Lucius Annaeus Seneca who wrote that "increases are of sluggish growth, but the way to ruin is rapid."