Jean-Pascal Van Ypersele

The term ‘Anthropocene’ was coined in recognition that human activities have ended the relatively stable environment of the Holocene epoch. However, its widespread adoption across the humanities, arts and sciences has led to diverse and sometimes incompatible definitions. In this Perspective, we argue for a stabilized definition of the Anthropocene epoch to help address contemporary environmental challenges, and explore various applications of the Anthropocene across disciplines. The Anthropocene epoch, with a proposed start point in 1952, underscores that human-driven global-scale environmental disruption differs from earlier human impacts of the Holocene, which did not cause such profound destabilization. This clear distinction enables quantitative and qualitative comparisons between the Holocene and Anthropocene epochs, as already utilized, for instance, within the planetary boundaries framework. As the Anthropocene Earth system transformation is systemic, political responses also need be systemic, rather

Pour le nucléaire, les décennies se suivent et ne se ressemblent pas. Il y a dix ans, une thématique centrale des politiques énergétiques de plusieurs pays européens, de l'Espagne à l'Allemagne ou à la Suède, était la fermeture des réacteurs nucléaires vieillissants. Aujourd'hui, la tendance semble s'être inversée. En Allemagne, l'évocation de la remise en service potentielle des trois derniers réacteurs fermés en 2023 a fait récemment débat, se heurtant à de fortes oppositions au sein de la coalition gouvernementale. La Belgique, en revanche, a décidé de sauter le pas, en affirmant son intention de nationaliser son parc nucléaire et de remettre en service des réacteurs qui avaient fait l'objet d'une fermeture que l'on croyait définitive.

Current energy projections often envision an expansion of nuclear capacities to decarbonize future energy systems. However, this contrasts with the historic and current status of the nuclear industry, marked by techno-economic challenges for both light-water and non-light-water reactor technologies. Regardless, projections of strong nuclear growth have persisted since the 1970s. This paper investigates the “nuclear energy paradox” which shows the recurring divergence between historical projections and actual developments. A data compilation of long-term energy projections from international organizations such as the IAEA and the IEA as well as energy system models like GCAM and MESSAGE, as used in the IPCC, reveal a recurring pattern of high-growth projections for nuclear power. Such projections often rest on techno-economic assumptions such as substantial cost reductions. We propose the concept of nuclear imaginaries to show that these assumptions are embedded into techno-economic visions of nuclear power de

Note préparatoire pour la conférence « Les limites planétaires en Belgique », 17 décembre 2025.

Dans le World Energy Outlook 2025 de l’Agence internationale de l’énergie (AIE) rendu public ce 12 novembre(1), le « Current Policies Scenario » (CPS), tombé en disgrâce en 2019, refait surface. Ce scénario suppose la pleine application des « politiques et régulations déjà en place ». C’est un scénario de triomphe de l’Amérique trumpienne : le pétrole et le gaz dominent encore le système énergétique en 2050 ; les émissions de CO2 diminuent à peine d’ici 2050 ; la température mondiale n’est pas stabilisée avant la fin du siècle.

We propose a new paradigm, as toxicology currently lacks the proper perspective. From the 1950s to the 1970s, at least one-third of all toxicological testing in the United States, including for chemicals and drugs, was misleading scientists, and this worldwide issue persists today. Moreover, petroleum-based waste and heavy metals have been discovered in pesticide and plasticizer formulations. These contaminations have now reached all forms of life. Widespread exposure to chemical mixtures promotes health and environmental risks. We discovered that pesticides have never undergone long-term testing on mammals in their full commercial formulations by regulatory authorities or the pesticide industry; instead, only their declared active ingredients have been assessed, contrary to environmental law recommendations. The ingredients of these formulations are not fully disclosed, yet the formulations are in general at least 1000 times more toxic at low environmentally relevant doses than the active ingredients alone u

Alors que l’IA dope les échanges mondiaux, l’OMC s’inquiète d’un avenir incertain face aux droits de douane et appelle à repenser la mondialisation.

À un peu moins de deux mois de l’ouverture de la COP30 à Belém, deux informations importantes : pour la première fois la Chine va s’engager sur un objectif de baisse de ses émissions ; le rapport Production Gap(1) indique que les émissions mondiales de CO2 résultant de la combustion d’énergie fossile devraient continuer d’augmenter si l’on se fie aux prévisions d’extraction des grands producteurs.

Pendant que plusieurs pays ont décidé de reconnaître l’Etat palestinien, le gouvernement israélien accélère la colonisation en Cisjordanie, occupée depuis 1967.

Climate change is driving rising global temperatures, ecological degradation, and widespread human suffering. Yet, as a collective, humanity has failed to implement sufficient changes to mitigate these threats. This paper introduces the concept of “global narcissism” as a speculative lens to analyze the psychological barriers to climate action. By examining different levels of narcissism and their manifestations in human responses to climate change, this framework highlights key obstacles to meaningful action. While humanity is diverse, and lived experiences vary greatly, this perspective offers a way to discuss patterns of response and resistance. A central challenge lies in humanity’s difficulty in recognizing its symbiotic relationship with the non-human world. Through the metaphor of “global narcissism” this paper explores how humanity’s response to ecological crisis mirrors narcissistic defense mechanisms and suggests a collapse is taking place. This framework provides insights into how psychological int