Flux continu

Science-based policies could successfully limit human-caused climate change, but when political parties are allowed to accept money from special interests, policies are distorted to the point of being ineffective. This is a solvable problem, but to clarify the situation and the needed actions, we need to first marshal the evidence. The draft Prologue of Sophie’s Planet is intended to help coherently organize the evidence. Here is Part III of V, with the final two paragraphs of Part II.

The world seems headed into another El Nino, just 3 years after the last one. Such quick return normally would imply, at most, an El Nino of moderate strength, but we suggest that even a moderately strong El Nino may yield record global temperature already in 2026 and still greater temperature in 2027. The extreme warming will be a result mainly of high climate sensitivity and a recent increase of the net global climate forcing, not the result of an exceptional El Nino, per se. We find that the principal drive for global warming acceleration began in about 2015, which implies that 2°C global warming is likely to be reached in the 2030s, not at midcentury.

The world seems headed into another El Nino, just 3 years after the last one. Such quick return normally would imply, at most, an El Nino of moderate strength, but we suggest that even a moderately strong El Nino may yield record global temperature already in 2026 and still greater temperature in 2027. The extreme warming will be a result mainly of high climate sensitivity and a recent increase of the net global climate forcing, not the result of an exceptional El Nino, per se. We find that the principal drive for global warming acceleration began in about 2015, which implies that 2°C global warming is likely to be reached in the 2030s, not at midcentury.

The Senate is on the verge of taking up a bill with the Orwellian title “Fix Our Forests Act.” It is designed to do the opposite, as Dan Galpern and I describe in an op-ed published yesterday in the Boston Globe, which is copied below with permission of the Globe. The bill would result in swaths of the public’s national forests becoming “categorical exclusion” zones open to logging exempt from any environmental review. Thus, the bill would override the purposes for which national forests were set up, including “outdoor recreation, range…watershed, and wildlife and fish purposes.” This sin is rationalized under the pretense that the Act will reduce wildfire risk and improve forest health by “thinning” the forest. This is nonsense, as our op-ed discusses.

87%. That’s how much the emissions of NVIDIA (worth 5 trillion dollars) increased in 2024, as an article from TruthDig is one of the only sources in the world to point out. This means it became the world’s most valuable company by answering soaring demand for AI… whilst doubling its carbon footprint. Not to mention water: Samsung’s next ‘mega-cluster’ of GPU fabs will consume half of Seoul’s water, says the same article.

Global temperature in 2025 declined 0.1°C from its El Nino-spurred maximum in 2024, making 2025 the second warmest year. The 2023-2025 mean is +1.5°C relative to 1880-1920. The 12-month running-mean temperature should decline for the next few months, reaching a minimum about +1.4°C. Later in 2026, we expect the 12-month running-mean temperature to begin to rise, as dynamical models show development of an El Nino. We project a global temperature record of +1.7°C in 2027, which will provide further confirmation of the recent global warming acceleration.

James Hansen : « Ce à quoi nous assistons aujourd'hui, c'est à une réticence scientifique poussée...

Selon la presse américaine, la nomination de la procureure en charge de ces dossiers, propulsée par Donald Trump avec pour mission de poursuivre ces deux figures honnies par le président, était invalide, faisant de toutes ses décisions des «abus de pouvoir exécutifs».

The growth rate of greenhouse gas (GHG) climate forcing increased rapidly in the last 15 years to about 0.5 W/m2 per decade, as shown by the “colorful chart” for GHG climate forcing that we have been publishing for 25 years (Fig. 1).[1] The chart is not in IPCC reports, perhaps because it reveals inconvenient facts. Although growth of GHG climate forcing declined rapidly after the 1987 Montreal Protocol, other opportunities to decrease climate forcing were missed. If policymakers do not appreciate the significance of present data on changing climate forcings, we scientists must share the blame.

James Hansen - Climate Reckoning in ATLAS25, Operaatio Arktis, Helsinki, Finland

L'ancien directeur du FBI James Comey a réclamé lundi l'annulation des poursuites à son encontre, faisant valoir qu'elles étaient motivées par la seule "rancune personnelle" du président américain Donald Trump.

Lors d’un rassemblement lundi 13 octobre au soir, la magistrate récemment inculpé a aussi exprimé son soutien au candidat démocrate à New York, Zohran Mamdani, autre bête noire du président américain.

La procureure générale de l'Etat de New York Letitia James, opposante déclarée de Donald Trump qui réclamait des poursuites à son encontre, a été inculpée jeudi par un grand jury fédéral en Virginie.

L'ancien directeur du FBI James Comey, l'une des bêtes noires du président américain Donald Trump, comparaît mercredi pour sa mise en accusation officielle pour entrave à une commission d'enquête parlementaire et fausses déclarations au Congrès.

L'inculpation, jeudi, pour fausses déclarations et entrave à une enquête du Congrès de James Comey, ancien directeur du FBI, apparaît comme le dernier épisode en date d'une campagne de représailles menée par Donald Trump contre ses adversaires politiques.

L'ancien patron du FBI James Comey a été inculpé jeudi pour entrave à la justice et fausse déclaration liées à son témoignage devant une commission du Sénat en 2020. Il encourt cinq ans de prison. Une inculpation immédiatement saluée par le président américain Donald Trump, dont les pressions visant ses adversaires politiques commencent à porter leurs fruits.

Predictably, soon, most young people will reject extremist views. This will be none too soon because it is the essential step leading to global political leadership that appreciates the threat posed by climate’s delayed response to human-made changes of Earth’s atmosphere. Then the annual fraud of goals for future “net zero” emissions announced at United Nations COP (Conference of Parties) meetings might be replaced by realistic climate policies. It is important, by that time, that we have better knowledge of the degree and rate at which human-made forcing of the climate system must be decreased to avoid irreversible, unacceptable consequences.

Climate sensitivity is substantially higher than IPCC’s best estimate (3°C for doubled CO2), a conclusion we reach with greater than 99 percent confidence. We also show that global climate forcing by aerosols became stronger (increasingly negative) during 1970-2005, unlike IPCC’s best estimate of aerosol forcing. High confidence in these conclusions is based on a broad analysis approach. IPCC’s underestimates of climate sensitivity and aerosol cooling follow from their disproportionate emphasis on global climate modeling, an approach that will not yield timely, reliable, policy advice.

Sensibilité climatique Les trois méthodes d’analyse – paléoclimat, observations satellites et modélisation climatique – indiquent une sensibilité climatique nettement plus élevée que la meilleure estimation du GIEC de 3 degrés Celsius ; notre meilleure estimation est de 4,5 degrés Celsius. Remarque : 4,5 °C se situe dans la plage très probable définie par le GIEC. « Sur la base de multiples sources de preuve, la plage très probable de la sensibilité climatique à l’équilibre est comprise entre 2 °C et 5 °C » (GIEC AR6 WG1 SPM A.4.4).

Why is the Trump Administration trying to kill a small space science institute in New York City? Explanation begins with Galileo’s method of scientific inquiry and ends with the role of special interest money in the United States government. Galileo improved the telescope, allowing clearer observations of the planets and the Sun. Galileo differed from his peers, as he was unafraid to challenge authority. He claimed that the world should be understood based on observations, and he spoke directly to the public. He obtained philanthropic support for his observations and openly described the conclusion that Earth was not the center of the solar system – Earth revolved around the Sun.

Even if agricultural practices adapt in response to higher temperatures, five of the world's six main staple crops will suffer severe losses due to climate change. Global corn yields are projected to fall by about 12 or 28 per cent by the end of the century

Earth’s albedo (reflectivity) declined over the 25 years of precise satellite data, with the decline so large that this change must be mainly reduced reflection of sunlight by clouds. Part of the cloud change is caused by reduction of human-made atmospheric aerosols, which act as condensation nuclei for cloud formation, but most of the cloud change is cloud feedback that occurs with global warming. The observed albedo change proves that clouds provide a large, amplifying, climate feedback. This large cloud feedback confirms high climate sensitivity, consistent with paleoclimate data and with the rate of global warming in the past century.

Het internationaal afgesproken klimaatdoel van maximaal 2° C opwarming is "dood". Dat zegt de gerenommeerde klimaatwetenschapper James Hansen. Volgens hem is de snelheid waarmee de Aarde opwarmt zwaar onderschat en dreigen we versneld af te stevenen op extreme weerfenomenen en klimaatrampen.

Global temperature for 2025 should decline little, if at all, from the record 2024 level. Absence of a large temperature decline after the huge El Nino-spurred temperature increase in 2023-24 will provide further confirmation that IPCC’s best estimates for climate sensitivity and aerosol climate forcing were both underestimates. Specifically, 2025 global temperature should remain near or above +1.5C relative to 1880-1920, and, if the tropics remain ENSO-neutral, there is good chance that 2025 may even exceed the 2024 record high global temperature.

Les températures de la Planète augmenteront pendant les prochaines décennies. Les catastrophes climatiques s’aggraveront au cours de cette période. A 2°C, il y aura beaucoup plus d’inondations et des vagues de chaleur plus fortes. Nous les subirons de plein fouet, probablement au cours des vingt prochaines années (James E.Hansen).

Global temperature leaped more than 0.4°C (0.7°F) during the past two years, the 12-month average peaking in August 2024 at +1.6°C relative to the temperature at the beginning of last century (the 1880-1920 average). This temperature jump was spurred by one of the periodic tropical El Niño warming events, but many Earth scientists were baffled by the magnitude of the global warming, which was twice as large as expected for the weak 2023-2024 El Niño.

... An “acid” test of our interpretation will be provided by the 2025 global temperature: unlike the 1997-98 and 2015-16 El Ninos, which were followed by global cooling of more than 0.3°C and 0.2°C, respectively, we expect global temperature in 2025 to remain near or above the 1.5°C level. Indeed, the 2025 might even set a new record despite the present weak La Nina. There are two independent reasons. First, the “new” climate forcing due to reduction of sulfate aerosols over the ocean remains in place, and, second, high climate sensitivity (~4.5°C for doubled CO2) implies that the warming from recently added forcings is still growing significantly.

Un nouvel article du grand climatologue James Hansen affirme que le réchauffement a accéléré il y a quelques années. La réduction des aérosols liés au fuel des navires en serait la cause. La fonte du Groenland dépasse les prévisions et mènera à un arrêt de la circulation océanique dans 20 -30 ans, ce qui provoquera plus tard une importante montée du niveau de la mer. Il suggère des prévisions climatiques complémentaires à celles du GIEC, qui s’appuieraient plus sur les observations de la réalité.

The climate science maverick believes catastrophe is inevitable, carbon offsetting is a joke and ethical living a scam. So what would he do?

Il est trop tard. Pour l'ancien climatologue de la Nasa, James Hansen, maintenir le réchauffement sous les 2°C est impossible.

De werkelijke omvang van de opwarming van de aarde is jarenlang gemaskeerd door vervuiling. "Nu wordt de werkelijke mate van opwarming zichtbaar", zegt James Hansen, een wetenschapper die in de jaren tachtig al waarschuwde voor klimaatverandering.

An engaging discussion on groundbreaking research that reveals the unexpected drivers behind the recent unprecedented rise in global temperatures. Moderated by SDSN President Professor Jeffrey Sachs, this virtual event explored Dr. James Hansen and colleagues' findings in the latest publication, “Global Warming Has Accelerated,” their implications for climate sensitivity, and the urgent need for alternative approaches to mitigate the looming "point of no return."

Prof James Hansen says pace of global heating has been significantly underestimated, though other scientists disagree

A rainforest might look intact in satellite images – but the reality is often different. Degraded tropical rainforests are now the norm, threatening the species within.

Ces idées ont des implications sur la manière dont l'hégémonie est pensée : dans la tradition de Gramsci, l'hégémonie sous-entend qu'une population dominée a intégré les normes dominantes. James C. Scott explique que cette erreur vient notamment d'un biais de méthode : en effet, si on ne regarde que le discours public des classes dominées, on risque de passer à côté de leurs réelles convictions. Selon Scott, ce discours de fausse complicité en public, dans ce type de société, s'explique par le simple besoin de survivre : le riche que l'on critique en privé, qui exploite les pauvres est aussi celui qui donne du travail.

Climate change should be at the heart of national security plans, say experts.

The net zero approach of the Paris agreement has become detached from reality as it increasingly relies on science fiction levels of speculative technology.

Breathless reporting on when the present global heat anomaly will begin to fall is understandable, given heat suffering around the world. However, fundamental issues are in question and a reflection on time scales is in order, for the sake of understanding ongoing climate change and actions that need to be taken.

Global temperature (12-month mean) is still rising at 1.56°C relative to 1880-1920 in the GISS analysis through April (Fig. 1). [Robert Rohde reports that it is 1.65°C relative to 1850-1900 in the BerkeleyEarth analysis.[3]] Global temperature is likely to continue to rise a bit for at least a month, peak this summer, and then decline as the El Nino fades toward La Nina. Acceleration of global warming is now hard to deny. The GISS 12-month temperature is now 0.36°C above the 0.18°C/decade trend line, which is 3.6 times the standard deviation (0.1°C). Confidence in global warming acceleration thus exceeds 99%, but we need to see how far temperature falls with the next La Nina before evaluating the post-2010 global warming rate.

Terwijl Oeganda honderden miljoenen donorgeld ontvangt voor bosbeheerprojecten zet een machtig houtkapsyndicaat, met tentakels in de regering, de woestijnvorming onverminderd voort. In Nigeria ruimt de overheid dan weer eigenhandig de bomen op. Intussen worden de lokale bevolkingen steeds armer.